[xmlsec] Coverity

[Aleksey Sanin]

Thanks for the idea! There was a report run about 10 years
ago and then RedHat had another run in 2014:

https://www.aleksey.com/pipermail/xmlsec/2014/009803.html

It might be a good idea to do it again. I am (slowly) finishing
error reporting cleanup right now. Probably I'll wait until
it is done to cover this major refactoring too.

Best,

Aleksey

On 1/17/17 8:03 AM, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> Hi Aleksey,
> 
> Did you try getting Coverity analyze xmlsec already in the past? If not,
> as far as I understand, you can apply for free here:
> 
> https://scan.coverity.com/projects/new
> 
> As long as you're an open source project, etc.
> 
> Assuming Coverity currently does not track xmlsec there, are you
> interested applying? If not, may I ask for the permission to apply
> there? I think anyone can apply who has commits in the git repo, but of
> course best would be if you would apply yourself. :-)
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Miklos
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xmlsec mailing list
> xmlsec at aleksey.com
> http://www.aleksey.com/mailman/listinfo/xmlsec
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://www.aleksey.com/pipermail/xmlsec/attachments/20170117/8191315e/attachment.sig>