[xmlsec] XmlDSig Enveloping another xml
Aleksey Sanin
aleksey at aleksey.com
Mon Jun 10 18:07:41 PDT 2013
http://www.aleksey.com/pipermail/xmlsec/2013/009563.html
Aleksey
On 6/10/13 9:35 AM, Alexwell Sandro wrote:
> Can I have access to that discussion?
>
> I cannot find...
> http://www.aleksey.com/pipermail/xmlsec/
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Aleksey Sanin <aleksey at aleksey.com
> <mailto:aleksey at aleksey.com>> wrote:
>
> There was a discussion about this a few months ago in this mailing list.
> Basically, xmlsec *does not* allow enveloping signatures for another
> xml file.
>
> Aleksey
>
> On 6/7/13 4:18 PM, Alexwell Sandro wrote:
> > I do not know if this is the list for this question.
> >
> > I am try to learn about enveloping signature.
> >
> > If I sign another xml file, what can happen?
> > I cannot find examples.
> >
> > *For this file:*
> >
> > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
> > <newdoc>
> > <content>hi</content>
> > </newdoc>
> >
> > *First case "using xmlAddChild":*
> > ...
> > *<ds:Object Id="obj-1236">*<newdoc>
> > <content>hi</content>
> > </newdoc>*</ds:Object>*
> > *</ds:Signature>*
> >
> > - The enconding declaration disappears...
> > - Possible namespace conflit (without prefix)
> >
> > *Second case "using xmlNodeSetContent":*
> > ...
> > *<ds:Object Id="obj-1236">*/<?xml version="1.0"
> > encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
/
> > /<newdoc>
/
> > / <content>hi</content>
/
> > /</newdoc>/*</ds:Object>*
> > *</ds:Signature>*
> >
> > Exists another way? What pros and cons?
> >
> > Can you recommend Articles.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > xmlsec mailing list
> > xmlsec at aleksey.com <mailto:xmlsec at aleksey.com>
> > http://www.aleksey.com/mailman/listinfo/xmlsec
> >
>
>
More information about the xmlsec
mailing list