[xmlsec] FW: Free/Destroy versus Memory Leak
Edward Shallow
ed.shallow at rogers.com
Mon May 1 18:41:33 PDT 2006
Here they are ...
Thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: Aleksey Sanin [mailto:aleksey at aleksey.com]
Sent: May 1, 2006 9:17 PM
To: ed.shallow at rogers.com
Cc: xmlsec at aleksey.com; 'Dmitry Belyavsky'
Subject: Re: [xmlsec] FW: Free/Destroy versus Memory Leak
> xmlsec verify --crypto mscrypto --repeat 1000 --trusted-der
> keys/upu-cacert.der inout/edsigned-enveloped.xml
>
> The run started off at around 4800K and ended up around 45,000K I
> changed --repeat to 2000 and I ended up at 86,000K
OK, I don't see any leaks on my test... Can you send the files you use in
this run, please?
Aleksey
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: edsigned-enveloped.xml
Type: text/xml
Size: 3471 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.aleksey.com/pipermail/xmlsec/attachments/20060501/8474018e/edsigned-enveloped-0002.xml
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: upu-cacert.der
Type: application/x-x509-ca-cert
Size: 1151 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.aleksey.com/pipermail/xmlsec/attachments/20060501/8474018e/upu-cacert-0002.bin
More information about the xmlsec
mailing list