[xmlsec] FW: Free/Destroy versus Memory Leak
Edward Shallow
ed.shallow at rogers.com
Sun Feb 19 14:35:51 PST 2006
.. Re-sending ... 1st one bounced ..
-----Original Message-----
From: Edward Shallow [mailto:ed.shallow at rogers.com]
Sent: February 19, 2006 5:21 PM
To: 'xmlsec at aleksey.com'
Subject: Free/Destroy versus Memory Leak
Hi Aleksey,
I seem to have all the functionality challenges behind me in this latest
project in which I have put xmlsec behind a Web Server.
Loads of functionality all working flawlessly on Igor's Windows binairies
Version 1.2.8 ... However ...
I am noticing that the process memory continues to grow throughout the day
at roughly 32K - 40K per request. This is even on a Verify with little
happening.
I am allocating the xmlsec environment only once at startup as follows:
- xmlsec.xmlSecInit()
- xmlsec.xmlSecCryptoDLInit()
- xmlsec.xmlSecCryptoDLLoadLibrary('mscrypto')
- xmlsec.xmlSecCryptoAppInit('MY')
- xmlsec.xmlSecCryptoInit()
Everything else is on a request-by-request basis including:
- libxml2 parsed docs
- keysMngr
- keyStore
- dsig context
- enc context
And all are being free'd or Destroyed using:
- libxml2.xmlFreeDoc
- xmlsec.xmlSecDSigCtxDestroy(context)
- xmlsec.xmlSecKeysMngrDestroy(mngr)
- xmlsec.xmlSecKeyStoreDestroy(store)
I have isolated the memory growth to the xmlsec environment by using
successively narrower 'quick returns'.
When I comment out the single xmlsec.xmlSecDSigCtxVerify(dsigCtx, sigNode)
call, it grows at only 1/10th the rate ~4K (but still grows).
Do you have any ideas or suggestions ?
Cheers,
Ed
More information about the xmlsec
mailing list