[xmlsec] Canonicalization problem?

[Roumen Petrov]

Oops wrong. problem exist. I think that this is libxml2 problem.

Roumen Petrov wrote:

> current version is 1.1.1. please update. I cannot see this problem in 
> current.
>
> Johannes Kjos wrote:
>
>> Hello!   
>> I'm using xmlsec 0.0.15 and have a problem using the LF/NL and CR 
>> entities
>> in xmlfiles used for enveloped-signature.
>>
>> Eks: <tag>&#13;&#10;Some text!</tag>
>>
>> - looks like this in XEmacs after signing:
>> <tag>^M Some text</tag>
>>
>>
>> OK, as far as I understand this is the canonicalization procedure which
>> replace the enities with ASCII LF/NL. The problem is, the signed file 
>> will
>> not be verified. Isn't that a bit strange, the canonicalization takes 
>> place
>> before any digest is made, and the binary representation will be the 
>> same in
>> "both ends"(when making digest before signing and before verifying)?...
>>
>> However if I drop the CR sign the ^M sign is gone and the signed file
>> verifies.
>>
>> Any thoughts on what's wrong?
>> Regards,
>> Johannes
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> xmlsec mailing list
>> xmlsec at aleksey.com
>> http://www.aleksey.com/mailman/listinfo/xmlsec
>>
>>
>>  
>>
>
>
>