[xmlsec] versioning and library naming policies

[Aleksey Sanin]

John,

I would be happy to make this stuff seamless for anyone myself and I 
have no problems
with adding the "-release N.M" option. However, this does not solve 
static libraries problem.
They still have no version number at all. Ideas?

Aleksey

John Belmonte wrote:

> In perhaps simpler terms, I suggest that xmlsec use the -release 
> option of libtool, using the major version numbers.  For example, when 
> releasing 0.0.15, use:
>
>     -release 0.0
>
> This means that compatibilty is broken whenever a point release is 
> made (0.1, 0.2, etc.), but that seems likely to happen in any case.
>
>
> -John
>
>
>