[xmlsec] versioning and library naming policies
Aleksey Sanin
aleksey at aleksey.com
Mon Mar 31 09:34:42 PST 2003
John,
I just looked at the librar namig and it seems that we are doing right
thing already:
[aleksey at lsh lib]$ ls *xmlsec*.so*
libxmlsec-gnutls.so libxmlsec-nss.so.0.1.1
libxmlsec.so.0
libxmlsec-gnutls.so.0 libxmlsec-openssl.so
libxmlsec.so.0.0.11
libxmlsec-gnutls.so.0.1.1 libxmlsec-openssl.so.0
libxmlsec.so.0.0.12
libxmlsec-nss.so libxmlsec-openssl.so.0.1.1
libxmlsec.so.0.1.1
libxmlsec-nss.so.0 libxmlsec.so
where *.so *.so.0 are just pointers to corresponding so.0.1.1, etc.
Right now there is
a names conflict (*.so.0) but it should go away because I am going to
name the
new release "1.0" (and then *.so.1 will point to new libraries, when
*.so.0 tp the old ones).
Why do you think it needs to be changed?
With best regards,
Aleksey
More information about the xmlsec
mailing list