[xmlsec] XML Security Library 1.1.0 is released

Aleksey Sanin aleksey@aleksey.com
Tue, 05 Aug 2003 15:32:10 -0700


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------010707070209060104030404
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

No, all the releases have the same numbering scheme. Development
releases are marked as such ("dev" or "pre" in the name). There was
a long discussion about version numbering, the results are described
here:

       http://www.aleksey.com/pipermail/xmlsec/2003/000769.html

if you want to understand "why" read that thread but it's long :)


Aleksey

Pierre THIERRY wrote:

>>XML Security Library 1.1.0 release
>>    
>>
>
>Are you using some conventions like the kernel developers, using odd
>minor version numbers for development versions, and even minor version
>numbers for stable releases ?
>
>Curiously,
>le Moine Fou
>  
>


--------------010707070209060104030404
Content-Type: text/html; charset=KOI8-R
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
  <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=KOI8-R">
  <title></title>
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
No, all the releases have the same numbering scheme. Development <br>
releases are marked as such ("dev" or "pre" in the name). There was<br>
a long discussion about version numbering, the results are described<br>
here:<br>
<br>
ššš šš <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.aleksey.com/pipermail/xmlsec/2003/000769.html">http://www.aleksey.com/pipermail/xmlsec/2003/000769.html</a><br>
<br>
if you want to understand "why" read that thread but it's long :)<br>
<br>
<br>
Aleksey<br>
<br>
Pierre THIERRY wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
 cite="mid20030805214236.GY14049@imperatrice.arcanes">
  <blockquote type="cite">
    <pre wrap="">XML Security Library 1.1.0 release
    </pre>
  </blockquote>
  <pre wrap=""><!---->
Are you using some conventions like the kernel developers, using odd
minor version numbers for development versions, and even minor version
numbers for stable releasesš?

Curiously,
le Moine Fou
  </pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>

--------------010707070209060104030404--