[xmlsec] versioning and library naming policies

[Aleksey Sanin]

 From what I am hearing, the goal is a *full* independence: users should 
be able
to have two different major releases installed in parallel. And binary 
files also
have API (option flags and/or features, for example).

Aleksey

Wan-Teh Chang wrote:

>  Aleksey Sanin wrote:
>
> > Well, you have valid points but I really don't like "xmlsec-1.1" as a
> > filename for
> > an executable.
>
>You don't need to have any version numbers in the executable programs'
>file names.  Older versions should be installed in separate directories
>and people who want to use older versions can point their PATH to those
>directories.
>
>Wan-Teh
>
>_______________________________________________
>xmlsec mailing list
>xmlsec@aleksey.com
>http://www.aleksey.com/mailman/listinfo/xmlsec
>  
>